[slurm-users] Slurm Reporting Difference between sreport and sacct

[Passant Hafez via slurm-users]

Hi all,

I was wondering if someone can help explaining this discrepancy.

I have different values for project gpu consumption using sreport vs sacct (+ 
some calculations)

This is an example that shows this:

sreport -t hours -T gres/gpu cluster AccountUtilizationByuser start=2025-04-01 
end=2025-04-05 | grep project1234
gives 178
while
sacct -n -X --allusers --accounts=project1234 --start=2025-04-01 
--end=2025-04-05 -o elapsedraw,AllocTRES%80,user,partition

gives
    213480                                  
billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2    gpuplus
    249507                                  
billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2    gpuplus
     13908                                     
billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1    gpuplus
      9552                                     
billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1    gpuplus
         4                                     
billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1        gpu
        11                                     
billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1        gpu
...



I will not bore you with the full output and its calculation, but the first job 
alone consumed 213480 seconds/60/60 * 8 gpus that's 474.4 gpu hours which is 
way more than the 178 hrs reported by sreport


Any clue why these are inconsistent? or how sreport calculated the 178 value?



All the best,
Passant

-- 
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com