If you run sshare
or sacctmgr show association where parent=root (and so forth recursively where parent= each of the children) do you find that these other accounts that can submit to the partition are not ultimately sub-accounts of "root"? Quoting man 5 slurm.conf, concerning AllowAccounts, "This list is also hierarchical, meaning subaccounts are included automatically." ________________________________________ Od: shaobo liu <dspam....@gmail.com> Poslano: torek, 29. oktober 2024 20:49 Za: Laura Hild Kp: slurm-users Zadeva: Re: [slurm-users] Re: Why AllowAccounts not work in slurm-23.11.6 My slurm is 23.02.6，used EnforcePartLimits=ALL，Accounts outside of AllowAccounts can still submit。 Laura Hild <l...@jlab.org<mailto:l...@jlab.org>> 于2024年10月19日周六 21:59写道： What do you have for `sacctmgr list account`? If "root" is your top-level (Slurm) (bank) account, AllowAccounts=root may just end up meaning any account. To have AllowAccounts limit what users can submit, you'd need to name a lower-level Slurm (bank) account that only some users have an Association with. -- slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com
