Hi Chris,
Thanks for confirming that UnkillableStepTimeout can have larger values
without issues. Do you have some suggestions for values that would safely
cover network filesystem delays?
Best regards,
Ole
On 10/24/24 07:51, Christopher Samuel via slurm-users wrote:
Some time ago it was recommended that UnkillableStepTimeout values above
127 (or 256?) should not be used, see https://support.schedmd.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=11103. I don't know if this restriction is still valid
with recent versions of Slurm?
As I read it that last comment includes a commit message for the fix to
that problem, and we happily use a much longer timeout than that without
apparent issue.
https://support.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11103#c30
--
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com
