NormShares changes to '1' for any user I modify like that. Everyone else has 
0.991736. The "FairShare" column does not change.


> On Aug 9, 2024, at 6:35 PM, Paul Raines <rai...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> 
> I have never used Slurm where I have not added users explicitly first so I
> am not sure what happens in that case.  But from your sshare output it
> certainly seems it default to fairshare=parent
> 
> Trying modify the users with
> 
>  sacctmgr modify user $username fairshare=200
> 
> and then run sshare -a -A mic to see what has changed.
> 
> 
> -- Paul Raines (http://help.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu)
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 5:57pm, Drucker, Daniel wrote:
> 
>> Hi Paul from over at mclean.harvard.edu<http://mclean.harvard.edu>!
>> 
>> I have never added any users using sacctmgr - I've always just had everyone 
>> I guess automatically join the default account, mic. Are you saying that is 
>> what is causing my problem?
>> 
>> I'm confused I guess because I would have expected that within an account - 
>> even if there is only one - users would get their 'fair share' of resources, 
>> rather than just defaulting to FIFO or something. But that doesn't seem to 
>> be the case.
>> 
>> I do not want any particular user to start out with more priority than any 
>> other particular user - I just want to make sure that if user A submits a 
>> million jobs at noon, and user B submits one job at 12:01, user B doesn't 
>> have to wait until those million jobs finish.
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 9, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Paul Raines <rai...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> This depends on how you have assigned fairshare in sacctmgr when creating
>> the accounts and users.  At our site we want fairshare only on accounts
>> and not users, just like you are seeing, so we create accounts with
>> 
>> sacctmgr -i add account $acct Description="$descr" \
>>       fairshare=200 GrpJobsAccrue=8
>> 
>> and users with
>> 
>> sacctmgr -i add user "$u" account=$acct fairshare=parent
>> 
>> If you want users to have their own independent fairshare, you
>> do not use fairshare=parent but assign a real number.
>> 
>> -- Paul Raines (http://help.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 5:20pm, Drucker, Daniel via slurm-users wrote:
>> 
>>     External Email - Use Caution
>> I got the opposite result. When I submitted a job as bsmith, they got a 
>> lower priority (the number was smaller) than the job submitted as csmith.
>> 
>> bsmith (who has never submitted a job before) got a priority of 98387 (which 
>> is 10000 times the 0.983871 FairShare), whereas csmith (who is already 
>> running a huge number of jobs and has been for days now) got a priority of 
>> 103749.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 9, 2024, at 5:11 PM, Renfro, Michael <ren...@tntech.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>     External Email - Use Caution
>> 
>> The format has changed a bit, since none of our RawShares column is ‘parent’.
>> 
>> But you can test this to be certain.
>> 
>> If your cluster already has jobs pending, have bsmith (who has zero usage) 
>> and csmith (who has a lot of usage, relatively) each submit several jobs 
>> into the pending queue. Alternatively, have bsmith and csmith submit jobs 
>> with larger resource requests: jobs that are large enough to automatically 
>> go into a pending state due to lack of resources. Those might be jobs that 
>> request the whole cluster, even.
>> 
>> bsmith’s jobs should get a higher priority as seen from sprio, and bsmith’s 
>> jobs should start earlier than csmith’s.
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
>> addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
>> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
>> Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
>> <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
>> Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish 
>> to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender 
>> of this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
>> receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
>> continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
>> 

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

-- 
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com

Reply via email to