Alexander Grund wrote: > Although it may be better to not drain it, I'm a bit nervous with "exit > 0" as it is very important that the job does not start/continue, i.e. > the user code (sbatch script/srun) is never executed in that case. > So I want to be sure that an `scancel` on the job in its prolog is > actually always preventing the job from running.
Just return the exit code of scancel, then. If it failed, the prolog failed and the job gets re-queued. If it didn't, the job was cancelled.
