Dear Peter, Thanks for your response. Yes, I am running ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup
The behavior that I was seeing with the default seff, and that Diego saw as well, was simply that seff was not reporting really any information for a given job. I'm glad it's working for you, but it doesn't for everyone, and I can't figure out why. Warmest regards, Jason On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:09 PM Peter Kjellström <c...@nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:15:59 -0500 > Jason Simms <sim...@lafayette.edu> wrote: > > > Dear Diego, > > > > A while back, I attempted to make some edits locally to see whether I > > could produce "better" results. Here is a comparison of the output of > > your latest version, and then mine: > > I'm not sure what bug or behavior you're seeing but seff has always > reported correct numbers for me (no local patch afaik). Re-checked right > now for two different clusters (different slurm): > > slurm-18.08.8 > slurm-contribs-18.08.8 > > And: > > slurm-20.02.4 > slurm-contribs-20.02.4 > > Are you running ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup? > > /Peter > -- *Jason L. Simms, Ph.D., M.P.H.* Manager of Research and High-Performance Computing XSEDE Campus Champion Lafayette College Information Technology Services 710 Sullivan Rd | Easton, PA 18042 Office: 112 Skillman Library p: (610) 330-5632