Hi;
I think you can use pacemaker cluster for a virtual slurmdb server. A
virtual slurmdb server which runs both slurmdb and mysql services on the
active slurmctl server. When the active slurmctl server die, You can try
to start on the passive one.
Regards;
Ahmet M.
23.07.2020 19:12 tarihinde Michael Robbert yazdı:
Peter,
I believe that the answer to your database question is that you don't have two
MySQL/MariaDB servers running at the same time. The only way that I know of to
run MySQL/MariaDB in an active-active setup, which is what you appear to be
describing, is with replication. The other setup is to run it in an
active-passive setup using something like Pacemaker/Corosync to manage which
node is active at any one time. The slurmctld and slurmdbd have built in
mechanisms to do failover internally, but MySQL/MariaDB doesn't work that way.
Mike Robbert
Colorado School of Mines
On 7/23/20, 09:56, "slurm-users on behalf of Peter Mayes"
<slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com on behalf of pma...@lenovo.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Colorado School of
Mines organization. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Folks,
Thanks for responses.
I probably didn't make my initial point totally clear, so following up
with clarification.
The NFS server is considered to be sufficiently highly available
("Designed for 99.9999% availability with redundant hot-swap components,
including controllers and I/O modules, power supplies, cooling modules")
that we had assumed this was sufficient for the Slurm database, without
additional Database HA features, like Galera, DRBD, etc etc
So the idea was to have the two Slurm server nodes, each running
slurmctld, slurmdbd, mariadb, but the two mariadb instances would be
referencing the same physical database, with only one of the Slurm nodes
doing any database updates at any one time.
Is this a possible configuration? If so, how to get both the mariadb
instances to be running simultaneously (with one idle) accessing the
same database files.
It seems silly to have two database instances on the same NFS server
replicating with something like Galera.
Thanks again
--
Peter
-------
Hi,
My first post to the list, so apologies if this is a FAQ,
My configuration has two nodes allocated for Slurm masters, with a
highly-available NFS server mounting a filesystem across the two nodes.
I need advice on the best configuration.
I naively thought of having a single MariaDB database located in the NFS
server, with slurmctld, slurmdbd and mariadb running on both slurm
nodes, with only one slurmdbd/mariadb actively touching the database at
any one time.
slurm.conf
----------
SlurmctldHost=slurm1(a.b.c.1)
SlurmctldHost=slurm2(a.b.c.2)
AccountingStorageHost=slurm1
AccountingStorageBackupHost=slurm2
slurmdbd.conf
-------------
DbdHost=slurm1
DbdBackupHost=slurm2
StorageHost=localhost
But MariaDB doesn't seem to like (possibly understandably) two mysql
daemons accessing a single database instance from two servers.
What would be the best way to configure this setup?
Thanks in advance
-- Peter
