Hi,
Thank you for your quick answer!
I’ll look into that, but they share the same hosts-file and the DHCP-server 
sets their hostname.

However I came across a setting in the slurm.conf-file ”Tmpfs” and there were a 
note regarding it in the guide of mpi at the slurms webpage. I implemented the 
proposed changes but still no luck.

Best regards,
Palle

________________________________
From: "slurm-users" <slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com>
Sent: 16 juli 2019 12:32
To: "Slurm User Community List" <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Running pyMPI on several nodes

srun: error: Application launch failed: Invalid node name specified

Hearns Law. All batch system problems are DNS problems.

Seriously though - check out your name resolution both on the head node and the 
compute nodes.


On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 08:49, Pär Lundö < 
par.lu...@foi.se<mailto:par.lu...@foi.se>> wrote:

Hi,

I have now had the time to look at some of your suggestions.

First I tried running "srun -N1 hostname" via a sbatch-script, while having two 
nodes up and running.
"sinfo" yields that two nodes are up and idle prior to submitting the 
sbatch-script.
After submitting the job, I receive an error stating that:

"srun: error: Task launch for 86.0 failed on node lxclient11: Invalid node name 
specified.
srun: error: Application launch failed: Invalid node name specified
srun: Job step aborted: Waiting up to 32 seconds for job step to finish.
srun: error: TImed out waiting for job step to complete"


>From the log file at the client I get a more detailed error:
" Launching batch job 86 for UID 1000
[86.batch] error: Invalid host_index -1 for job 86
[86.batch] error: Host lxclient10 not in hostlist lxclient11
[86.batch] task_pre_launch: Using sched_affinity for tasks
rpc_launch_tasks: Invalid node list (lxclient10 not in lxclient11)"

My two nodes are called lxclient10 and lxclient11.
Why is my batch job launched with the UID 1000, shouldnt it be launched via the 
slurm-user (which in my case has the UID 64030)?
What is meant by that the different nodes are not in the nodeslist?
The two nodes and the server share the same setup of IP-addresses in the 
"/etc/hosts"-file.

-> This was resolved due to that lxclient10 was noted as down. Getting it back 
up, the submitting of the same sbatch-script, resulted in no error.
However running it on two nodes I get an error
"srun: error: Job Step 88.0 aborted before step completely launched.
srun: error: Job step aborted: Waiting up to 32 seconds for job step to finish.
srun: error: task 1 launched failed: Unspecifed error
srun: error: lxclient10: task 0: Killed"

And in the slurmctld.log-file from the client I get an error similiar to that 
prevously stated, that the pmix cannot bind UNIX socket 
/var/spool/slurmd/stepd.slurm.pmix.88.0: Address already in use (98)

I ran the lsof command, but I dont really know what I am looking after, I can 
see if I grep with the different nodenames that the two nodes have mounted the 
nfs-partition and that a link is established.

"As an aside, you have checked that your username exists on that compue server? 
     getent passwd par
Also that your home directory is mounted - or something substituting for your 
home directory?"
Yes, the user slurm exists on both nodes and have the same uid.

"Have you tried


        srun -N# -n# mpirun python3 ....


Perhaps you have no MPI environment being setup for the processes?  There was 
no "--mpi" flag in your "srun" command and we don't know if you have a default 
value for that or not.

"

In my slurm.conf-file I do specify that "MpiDefault=pmix" (And it can be seen 
in the logfile that there is something wrong with pmix, that the address 
already in use.)

One thing that struck my mind now is that I run these nodes as a pair of 
diskless nodes, whom boots and mounts the same filesystem which is supplied by 
a server. The run differen pids for different processes which should not affect 
one another(?), right?


Best regards,

Palle

On 2019-07-12 19:34, Pär Lundö wrote:
Hi,

Thank you so much for your quick responses!
It is much appreciated.
I dont have access to the cluster until next week, but I’ll be sure to follow 
up on all of your suggestions and get back you next week.

Have a nice weekend!
Best regards
Palle

________________________________
From: "slurm-users" 
<slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com><mailto:slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com>
Sent: 12 juli 2019 17:37
To: "Slurm User Community List" 
<slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com><mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Running pyMPI on several nodes

Par, by 'poking around' Crhis means to use tools such as netstat and lsof.
Also I would look as ps -eaf --forest to make sure there are no 'orphaned' 
jusbs sitting on that compute node.

Having said that though, I have a dim memory of a classic PBSPro error message 
which says something about a network connection,
but really means that you cannot open a remote session on that compute server.

As an aside, you have checked that your username exists on that compue server?  
    getent passwd par
Also that your home directory is mounted - or something substituting for your 
home directory?


On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 15:55, Chris Samuel < 
ch...@csamuel.org<mailto:ch...@csamuel.org>> wrote:
On 12/7/19 7:39 am, Pär Lundö wrote:

> Presumably, the first 8 tasks originates from the first node (in this
> case the lxclient11), and the other node (lxclient10) response as
> predicted.

That looks right, it seems the other node has two processes fighting
over the same socket and that's breaking Slurm there.

> Is it neccessary to have passwordless ssh communication alongside the
> munge authentication?

No, srun doesn't need (or use) that at all.

> In addition I checked the slurmctld-log from both the server and client
> and found something (noted in bold):

This is from the slurmd log on the client from the look of it.

> *[2019-07-12T14:57:53.771][83.0] task_p_pre_launch: Using sched affinity
> for tasks lurm.pmix.83.0: Address already in use[98]*
> [2019-07-12T14:57:53.682][83.0] error: lxclient[0] /pmix.server.c:386
> [pmix_stepd_init] mpi/pmix: ERROR: pmixp_usock_create_srv
> [2019-07-12T14:57:53.683][83.0] error: (null) [0] /mpi_pmix:156
> [p_mpi_hook_slurmstepd_prefork] mpi/pmix: ERROR: pmixp_stepd_init() failed

That indicates that something else has grabbed the socket it wants and
that's why the setup of the MPI ranks on the second node fails.

You'll want to poke around there to see what's using it.

Best of luck!
Chris
--
  Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Berkeley, CA, USA


--
Hälsningar, Pär
________________________________
Pär Lundö
Forskare
Avdelningen för Ledningssystem

FOI
Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut
164 90 Stockholm

Besöksadress:
Olau Magnus väg 33, Linköping


Tel: +46 13 37 86 01<tel:+46%2013%2037%2086%2001>
Mob: +46 734 447 815<tel:+46%20734%20447%20815>
Vxl: +46 13 37 80 00<tel:+46%2013%2037%2080%2000>
par.lu...@foi.se<mailto:par.lu...@foi.se>
www.foi.se<http://www.foi.se>

Reply via email to