Paddy Doyle <pa...@tchpc.tcd.ie> writes: > Looking back through the mailing list, it seems that from 2015 onwards the > recommendation from Danny was to use 'jobacct_gather/linux' instead of > 'jobacct_gather/cgroup'. I didn't pick up on that properly, so we kept with > the cgroup version. > > Is anyone else still using jobacct_gather/cgroup and are you seeing this > same issue?
Just a side note: In last year's SLUG, Tim recommended the following settings: proctrack/cgroup, task/cgroup, jobacct_gather/cgroup So the recommendation for jobacct_gather might have changed -- or Danny and Tim might just have different opinions. :) -- Regards, Bjørn-Helge Mevik, dr. scient, Department for Research Computing, University of Oslo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
