Loris Bennett <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de> writes: [snip (93 lines)]
> Unfortunately sacctmgr just doesn't list 'geochemie' as being an > account. It only appears as the parent of the research groups which are > below it in the hierarchy: > > $ /usr/bin/sacctmgr -or show accounts | egrep 'geo|Acc|---' > Account Descr Org > ---------- -------------------- -------------------- > agalpha agalpha geochemie > agbravo agbravo geophysik > agcharlie agcharlie geologie > agdelta agdelta geographie > agecho agecho geologie > agfoxtrot agfoxtrot geographie > geographie geographie geowiss > geologie geologie geowiss > geophysik geophysik geowiss > geowiss geowiss root > meteorolo+ meteorologie geowiss > > It doesn't appear as a child of 'geowiss'. It does however turn up in > the list of associations: > > $ /usr/bin/sacctmgr -or show assoc format=account | egrep 'geo|Acc|---' > Account > ---------- > geowiss > geochemie > geographie > geologie > geophysik [snip (21 lines)] I have subsequently come across a similar case. In August 2017 I created an account, a user and a corresponding association. Today I found myself unable to create a new association with a new user and the account from August. Looking into the Slurm database, I saw that the account was missing from 'acct_table'. However, trying to add it with $ sacctmgr -v add account agschmidt parent=chemie gave me sacctmgr: Accounting storage SLURMDBD plugin loaded with AuthInfo=(null) No associations created. I have ended up having to insert a record directly into the database, which seems to have worked in that I was then able to create the new association. This is all with 17.02.11. Cheers, Loris -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.) ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
