We don't use prolog scripts, but it would be the best to start the
upgrade asap.

Many thanks for the advices!

Cheers,
Marcel


Am 09.06.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Loris Bennett:
> 
>> Am 09.06.2017 um 12:02 schrieb Loris Bennett:
>>>
>>> Hi Marcel,
>>>
>>> Marcel Sommer <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Slurm accounting problem with GPFS 
>>>>
>>>> Hi, 
>>>>
>>>> we are running slurm 2.6.5 and we have a master and a backup
>>>> controller configuration. We use the filetxt plugin and the accounting
>>>> logfile is stored in a folder on a central filesystem (GPFS).
>>>>
>>>> The problem that we have is that the accounting stuck after a couple
>>>> of days. When I restart the slurm daemon it works fine but a few days
>>>> later the problem comes again.
>>>>
>>>> Have you any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Marcel
>>>
>>> The combination of GPFS, filetxt, and, in particular, such an old version
>>> of Slurm is probably quite rare, so I suspect not many people will be
>>> able to help you.  Unless, that is, it is a known problem, in which case
>>> it has probably been fixed in a later version.  In addition, it now says
>>> the following on the Slurm download page:
>>>
>>>   Due to a security vulnerability (CVE-2016-10030), all versions of
>>>   Slurm prior to 15.08.13 or 16.05.8 are no longer available.
>>>
>>> So you need to do an update anyway.  And as the intermediate versions
>>> are now no longer available, you basically just need to set up Slurm
>>> again from scratch.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that,
>>>
>>> Loris
>>>
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Hi Loris,
>>
>> thank you for the quick reply. Unfortunately this old version comes from
>> Ubuntu 14.04 what we have installed on the nodes.
>>
>> OK, the easier solution for us is to try to install an newer slurm
>> version on this OS.
>>
>> ...or can a slurmdbd backend solve this problem?
> 
> Hard to say, but even if it does fix this problem, you will still be
> using a very old version with a serious security problem (although if
> you are not using a prolog script, you won't be affected).
> 
> If I were you, I would install a fairly current version.  You will get a
> lot of new functionality and more people on the mailing list will be
> able to help you if you do have any issues.  But, of course, it's your
> call.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Loris
> 

Reply via email to