can't you just use different libc (glibc) for slurm? 2017-01-16 20:31 GMT+01:00 Rowan, Jim <[email protected]>:
> > Hi, > > We're trying to bring up slurm (compute nodes, not the master) on a > platform that uses musl for libc. Musl doesn’t support lazy binding of > symbols in dynamic objects — a feature that seems to be a cornerstone of > the plugin implementation. > > Has anyone done work on getting around this issue? Ideas to share on > what approach to take? Our cluster is very simple; we don’t need any of > the fancy things that plugins provide, but it appears that even linear > scheduling is a plugin. > > > > > Jim Rowan > [email protected] > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by the Linux Foundation > >
