On 02/09/16 18:54, Paddy Doyle wrote: > We currently have the dbd on 16.05.4 and have some 15.x clusters still > pointing > to it fine. I can't recall exactly, but in the past we may have even had 2 > major > releases behind pointing to an up-to-date dbd... I'm not sure how far back you > can go, but I suspect 14.x talking to a 16.x dbd would be fine.
Slurm supports 2 major releases behind. So a 16.05.x slurmdbd should talk to 15.08.x and 14.11.x slurmctld's but *not* 14.03.x. All the best, Chris -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: [email protected] Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
