Andrew Gallagher dijo [Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:10:33PM +0100]: > On 20/07/2021 21:49, Andreas Puls wrote: > > Do we have any Pool alternative yet, or shall we just "quit" it ? > > Whether you want to quit it depends on what you're doing "it" for. :-) > > There is currently no pool, although there has been some discussion over on > the gnupg-devel list about restarting one. I'm skeptical of the utility of > such a thing (see my earlier posts for why, I don't want to be a bore). But > I hope that a synchronising network of keyservers can survive, and grow to > include keys.openpgp.org, keyserver.ubuntu.com etc. - so IMO having a > healthy community of keyserver operators is still valuable.
I understand the issues of a single point of contact regarding GDPR, but am anyways worried about how to better serve users of the WoT network. At the very least, an easy-to-find listing of keyservers to choose from. I guess that information derived/simplified from what can be currently found at sks-status.gwolf.org could be useful for this, but distributed among operators to reduce the single-point-of-failure issue.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
