Hi! "Kiss Gabor (Bitman)" <ki...@ssg.ki.iif.hu> writes: > I found requests for https://keys.gnupg.net/ in my Apache logs > on keys.niif.hu. Of course they were unsuccessful because > my HTTP daemon is not set up to provide this virtual site. > > In the DNS we can see this: > keys.gnupg.net CNAME pool.sks-keyservers.net > > Phil Pennock writes on http://sks.spodhuis.org/: > | End-users should use a pool definition, such as keys.gnupg.net which will > | alias into an operational pool. > > So this seems to be a well known situation but I don't believe > it would be a wise thing. > Google is full of complaints about "unreachable" or "non functional" > keys.gnupg.net. The reason is above. > > What do you think, folks?
AFAIR keys.gnupg.net has been discussed here and keyserver oeprators are expected to make this work -- at least for hkps. of course -- if people use keys.gnupg.net with https, this advice should probably be fixed and/or the cname be moved to the "right" pool Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
