On 10/15/2011 7:51 AM, John Clizbe wrote: > I still think we have a ways to go to make SKS portable to more operating > systems -- I think MacPorts provides the better framework than Fink to do this > on OS X.
I belong to the "a pox on both their houses!" school myself, when choosing between Fink and MacPorts. I have generally had better experiences with Fink, but both projects seem to be alarmingly incomplete in fundamental ways. > Cygwin port anyone? Ocaml and bdb are already there :-) What might be interesting is to port it to F#. F# is a heavily Ocaml-influenced functional language from Microsoft that runs atop the .NET runtime. A port would be nontrivial, but would allow us to run the same codebase on Win32, OS X, and most of the free Unices. > As well as ideas as to what type of sample web pages to to include. I also > think > if we are going to go that far, we shuld also provide sample membership, > mailsync, sksconf, DB-CONFIG for both KDB and PTree. As an FYI, I'm currently looking around to find *good, competent* Web designers. (I've found several designers I don't want to work with. Alas, competency and graphic design skill are hard to find in the same person.) My goal is to hire them to design good-looking web pages for SKS, with all styling done by CSS to make future editing easier. (And yes, I'm aware of the SKS webserver's limitations: those, too, are part of the spec.) If anyone knows of *good, competent* Web designers who would like a small paying gig that's only a few pages long, send them my way, please.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
