Bob,
I am passingly familiar with the Silverlon site, which is fascinating.
Correct me if I am wrong, but is it not true that the Silverlon
bandages use silver particles in order to generate the ions?
IAW, is it not true that the user starts with a silver-impregnated
bandage, adds water, and some kind of interaction between the water,
skin, and bandage ingredients generates ions?
My point in asking this is simple: Frank Key claims that ingested
silver particles -- true colloids -- are effective, others claim only
ingested ions are effective, and I, as a layman, am strictly agnostic,
other than to believe, from experience, that EIS, which contains both
ions and particles, is effective both internally and externally.
Now: could it be that in vivo, the silver particles from EIS are
effective because they GENERATE ions?
I know I am going over old territory here, but despite reading all the
messages on this list, I have never been perfectly clear about the
various claims regarding this particular issue. I don't expect a
resolution anytime soon, but I hope my question helps to clarify the
issues involved.
JBB
On Friday, Nov 4, 2005, at 09:06 Asia/Tokyo, Robert Berger wrote:
Greetings listers,
If you have not visited www.silverlon.com, ;lately you should and
print out as much as you want or need.
The print format is at the end of each article.
The some and substance is that silver ions do the work of tissue
regenration, not particles.
"Ole Bob"
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
