I have seen several successful uses of the Airbrush. There are two important considerations for using a standard nebulizer rather than the.
1. It is much easier to use. It does not require any adjustment. The airbrush requires disassembly and cleaning. As simple as that task is, it is intimidating and bothersome to many people. 2. The airbrush has a iron top that screws on to the glass liquid container. I do not know for sure, but have been told that it is destructive to CS to allow it to contact iron. The liquid particle size of the airbrush, when properly adjusted, is actually smaller than the colloid (CS in Air or O2 is a colloid within a colloid) produced by a good medical nebulizer, as measured by Brooks Bradley's Pro Medical Tech team at the Harborne Institute. The output of the airbrush can be adjusted to be invisible, yet wet a surface against which it is directed, while nebulizers produce a fog. Does anyone know if that difference in particle size effects the penetration of the sol into the alveoli? Later, Jim -----Original Message----- From: Richard Harris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:40 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Richard Harris Subject: RE: CS>CS pneumonia protocol with air brush Hi Stuff, Thank you for your excellent article that you shared on this subject! I look forward to sharing with many sufferers who come my way. Sincerely, _______________________________________ Richard Harris, 57 Year FL Pharmacist 448 West Juniata Street Clermont, FL 34711 www.rharrisinc.com http://www.seasilver.com/reh http://healthandhealing.blogspot.com -----Original Message----- From: kent [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 3:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: CS>CS pneumonia protocol with air brush > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stuff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CS>CS pneumonia protocol with air brush > > Tackling drug-resistant pneumonia with colloidal silver > > The procedure outlined here will work on any lung pathogen including > anthrax; In fact, an M.D. in the USA has been using this type of > procedure > for 10 years and is proposing it for anthrax. Here it is, straight > from the > lab: > > The original problem manifested as a result of our fruitless search for > some effective procedure for attacking the bilateral form of those > bacterial pneumonias which have proved non-responsive to all of the > antibiotic protocols. We have evaluated colloidal silver and many > methods > of its employment. Only one method was ever rapidly effective in an > "essentially terminal" evaluation. The methodology employed in these > experiments included the following protocol: Using a very fine particle > nebulizer, a 25 psi to 35 psi, regulated O2 supply as the gas drive > and a > colloidal silver mixture compounded as follows: Starting with 8 ounces > of > 10 ppm colloidal silver (warmed to approx. 105 degrees F.) dissolve > MSM in > this solution to the point of saturation (until no more will go into > solution); next add 20 per cent by volume of DMSO to the parent > mixture. > > The complete report: > > http://philaero-wellness.com/content/view/160/ -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
