Jason writes:
> The issue is soley about marketing...  A dispute between commercial
> vendors, and has nothing to do with product safety, effectiveness, or
> customer complaints, etc. 

That is consistent with and extends the little that I know at this 
point.

This is why I feel strongly that marketing strategies that attack other 
products and therapies are destructive overall and ultimately threaten 
our rights and freedom in the current regulatory environment.

This is also why I restrict the activities of vendors here. The several 
that participate regularly have demonstrated their ability to (almost 
always) behave in a civil and constructive fashion, and to minimize the 
influence of their commercial interests on their contributions. 

A few other vendors have not behaved as well and have been turned away 
as a result. This includes people who could have contributed a great 
deal, but chose not to when they were not allowed to burden the list 
with their conflicts with other vendors.

In this place, postures that are assumed solely for marketing purposes 
are out of place. Broad statements and claims that dispute widely 
accepted experience are not acceptable. We do not want debunkers here.

Obviously, user reports are welcome, pro and con, so long as they're 
not influenced by financial or other considerations. 

Be well,

Mike Devour
silver-list owner

[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[[email protected]                        ]
[Speaking only for myself...               ]


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>