Then that proves mind over matter! How did they test the water? I used a UV scanning spectrometer to prove that water had memory. I can't say for water, but I know for a fact that quartz also has memory, and this does NOT depend on the experimenter knowing anything. When I was testing the memory, reiki was done on water inside the quartz vial that the spectrometer uses, and it totally messed up the quartz, making it unusable. I sent to back to Hach and they said the quartz was messed up with contamination or something, and all they could do was replace it. All that was ever in it was distilled water. Anyway, I got it back and had a friend do a mental clearing on it, and it was back to normal.
I guess I should rerun the tests as a double blind test. Marshall Ode Coyote wrote: > Also on Tech TV last night was a story about the memory of water and > homeopathy. > It was proven that water itself has no memory..unless..the experimentor knew > which vial had the homeopathic treatment. [something that was apparent as the > common denominator between the various experiments but not dwelt upon for > some reason] > His/her "gateway" to the memory? > > Prayer, energy healing, Reikie [sp?], homeopathy...all interactive > methods...all work. But induce certainty that they don't..and they don't. > Skepticism is about doubt and has little or no effect. Most so-called > skeptics are not skeptics. They are not doubtful, they are certain. > Introduce certainty of failure into the interaction and that's what you > 'access' so that's what you find. > > "Seek and ye shall find" > A hologram has no preferences as to what you look for. [Holograms are whole, > containing here AND there in any given spot...but defining a spot reduces > resolution to where the closer you look, the less you can see.] > You can hide anything behind a fractal. [Perception is quantum..either here > OR there in 'appearance'. 'In between' cannot be perceived] > If you contemplate a fractal design..zoom in on it...you can actually 'see' > your perceptions take leaps when the fractal portion grows larger till it > reaches the comprehensive limits of your perception then instantly > disintigrates into smallness to grow again. You can tell it happened, you > just can't perceive it happening. > It's like, Zoooom POP!....zooommmm POP! Sorta like electron shells as > perceived as objects in space/time > .....yet...electrons communicate instantly over a distance [Einsteins > unexplained 'spooky action at a distance' observation] > > Perhaps distance itself is simply a matter of perception? > Do we identify ourselves and define the subsequent limitations of reality by > what we perceive? > Do we see with organs of perception that are only apparent to us 'because' we > perceive ourselves with them? > ..and just how much are these organs designed to NOT see? > > Perceptive organs are designed to focus in order to see things clearly...to > establish definition, yet, the closer you look, the less of anything else can > be seen. [And if you focus too tightly..even that loses its contextual > placement in perceived reality as definition becomes too limited to even hold > that object in view as an object] > > Total chaos contains all possible orders. > There are faces in my carpet. The more of them I look for, the more of them I > can see. The more loosely I define what a face should look like and be > recognizable as such..... > Ode > > At 10:35 PM 8/17/2003 EDT, you wrote: > >>>> > > > http://www.techtv.com/cybercrime/internetfraud/story/0,23008,3389209,00.html > > <<<< > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour
