url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60276.html
CS>Spam Arrest
From: M. G. Devour
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:24:52

  > Lee Elder wrote:

  >> Mike Monett-  Sorry! I guess you don't know anything  about "Spam
  >> Arrest" I don't want you to send me any emails anyway!!

  >> I just  found out about it from 'V' today and have  installed the
  >> program to get rid of spam, it works!!!

  > Spam Arrest?  If  it's doing what it looks like  it's  doing, then
  > every new  person who posts to the silver list is going  to  get a
  > message from your spam program, and every time somebody new starts
  > to use  "Spam Arrest", it's going to start the cycle all  over. If
  > that *IS*  the way this "service" behaves, then I will  make  it a
  > policy to ban anybody who chooses to use it.

  > I advise you to figure out how to train Spam Arrest to  accept any
  > mail that contains the following headers, or else dump it.

  >> Resent-From:                [email protected]      Reply-To:
  >> [email protected]

  > If anybody is seeing something I'm not, please explain it to me. I
  > don't want to make problems for anybody unless it's necessary.

  > That said,  I  will not allow every new member to  be  confused by
  > such suspicious and unwarrented responses the first time they post
  > to the list.

  > Mike Devour
  > silver-list owner

  Hi Mike,

  I checked the header:

  Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
  From: "support-at-spamarrest.com |Feb 2003 G|" 
  <[email protected]>
  To: xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: Spam Arrest Verification Confirmation
  Mime-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  X-Sneakemail-Label: Feb 2003 G
  X-Sneakemail-Address: [email protected]
  X-Sneakemail-Rcpt: [email protected]
  X-Sneakemail-Keyword:
  X-Sneakemail-Return-Path: [email protected]
  X-Sneakemail-From: [email protected]
  X-Mozilla-Status: 0001

  Dear Mike Monett,

  ...rest omitted...

  -------------------------------------------------------------

  The email was sent privately to me.

  It seems to look like he paid for this service, and it  went through
  his address book where it found my address.

  But why my address was in there, and why the email had the following
  Subject line is very strange:

    Subject: RE: Re: CS>$$$ perpectives (verification)

  That doesn't  look like a legitimate reason for  verifying  an email
  address by  a  legitimate service from someone who  doesn't  want to
  talk with me.

  I remain a bit sceptical.

Best Regards,

Mike Monett


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>