Thank you so much Brooks. This really helps to clear things up. I like your idea of reversing the polarity of the DC every 10 seconds or so (up to 30 seconds). This sounds like it will actually keep the sludge from forming.
I am planning on building an ultra low frequency 30VAC (square wave) circuit (same as reversing the wires to the electrodes) to test this out. Many thanks! Bil ----- Original Message ----- From: BROOKS BRADLEY <[email protected]> To: 2001 TV VCR <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Particle Size > Dear Bil. > Please do understand, It has been a year > since we completed our CS evaluations and I would have to access our > archives (or have someone else do so) to obtain specific data. Since my > time seems to have a multitude of claims on it, and it is foundation > policy to not disclose actual data trains----except to cooperating > partners involved in specific projects......I would be unable to send or > post exact data. However, I can---based upon my personal > judgement---summarize efforts and disclose general parameters/findings > of "most" of our principal health-based researches. > With the foregoing in mind, I can---from general > memory---make some observations of possible value to you. I followed > our evaluations quite CLOSELY throughout the 12 month span of their > duration. > Regarding particle size stability. We tested material from > our evaluation samples at periods of 48 hrs after generation, 2 weeks > after generation; 2 months after generation; and 9 months after > generation. Except in those cases of "purposely generated" higher > currents ( above 12.5 MA for simple 2 electrode sys.), where there did > occur some particle agglomeration---at generation---we experienced very > little particle agglomeration....or fall-out---during the entire 9 month > testing period. However, all of our samples were kept in opague glass > or plastic H2O2 bottles and in a stabilized temperature environment of > between 55 and 80 degrees F. Interestingly, some test samples left in > direct light (but not sunlight), in clear glass containers, maintained > both particle size, clarity and medical efficacy......for at least 45 > days (this was the longest period tested). > I do not know of the experiences of others, but heated water > (below 185 degrees F.) NEVER caused us a problem during generation. We > DID experience some particle agglomeration at increasing current levels > (continuously above 12.5). > However, as a point of information---when we maintained adequate > solution mixing/aggitation, plus polarity switching (anywhere between 10 > and 20 second intervals), we were able to achieve much higher current > levels (20+ M.A.), WITHOUT AGGLOMERATION OCCURRING. I never mentioned > this to the list membership because few of them have our control > resources for maintaining/observing all of the more critical parameters > required for achieving repeatable uniformity. We found that the > principal characteristic of elevated temperature---in our tests---was > its accelerating effect on the process. The most deleterious effects > came from NOT keeping the solution adequately mixed during the rapid > current run-ups---during some of our evaluations. The intensified > "particle cloud" between the electrodes (when not thoroughly > distributed) caused more complications, than did any other > parameter......excepting water quality and contamination substances. > Relating to you final question: actually, the initial > current increases were not found to be significant in their untoward > effects on the quality of the CS solutions. Problems began to manifest, > only after higher current levels were reached (because of increased > particle-field density AND the non-homogeneous character of the > conducting path), and then exponential current growth would occur ----if > these conditions were not promptly modified. > Attempting to generate CS of similar/identical strength > and composition is quite simple, provided one has access to a simple > Milliampere scale on a cheap multimeter. With this single tool and > through the use of common sense cleaning of the > electrodes---periodically---excellent product may be achieved. The > actual applied voltage may vary from 12 to 36 vdc without any > appreciable variation in the quality of the CS. Only the generation > time varies; if all parameters, other than applied voltage remain > constant. > I hope these comments are of value to you. > Sincerely. Brooks > Bradley. > > 2001 TV VCR wrote: > > > Brooks, > > > > Could you please elaborate some on the > > CS samples which you had tested for > > particle size. As I recall you did not say > > how many hours or days had elapsed from > > the time the batches were produced to > > when they were tested. > > > > Marshall is always saying that hot water > > and unregulated current will contribute to > > larger particles. I prefer to believe your > > story since you had such a variety of > > samples tested. It sure would help clear > > things up for a lot of people if your tests > > revieled a small particle size which > > remained even after several days. > > > > One last note. One of the guys on this list > > said that he used 24VAC, no current limit- > > ing and the CS came out fine. Any comm- > > ents? > > > > Thank you for all of your help, > > > > Bil > > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
