A Conflict of Interest skews scientific results. Foremost to study
reliability of journal printed studies is John Ioannidis. He finds that
the vast majority are not reprocible, many are fraudulant (reaching
extremely high levels in Egypt for example) and basically its a mess.
The Lancet and Nature are now scandalized for fake studies and industry
captured editorials.
Dr. Luis Garegnani from Argentia wrote an opinion piece on Ivermectin
not having enough evidence behind it in BMJ Journals. Dr. Pierre Kory of
the FLCCC disagrees. Both doctors debate this issue with Dr. Erin Stair
as the moderator.
https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-pros-vs-cons-dr-luis-garegnani-and-dr-pierre-kory-debate-the-issue/
To get a more balanced and insightful understanding of ivermectin, see
various videos from Dr Mobeen Syed
Dr Mobeen Syed
Ivermectin mechanism of action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZoBAuR4ajs
Dr Mobeen Interviews Dr Tessa Lawrie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEIzHPIRHhc
75% reduction in deaths with ivermectin
interview with Syed and Schwartz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htt1mlvBwBA
Best ivermectin meta analysis, Dr John Campbell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j7am9kjMrk
Ivermectin probably reduces death by 62% and transmission by 86%
Is the vaccine safe and effective? Data analysis finds big problems
with this highly conflicted opinion
"In every case, the unexpected excess death post-vaccination is
significantly higher than pre-vax. "
https://twitter.com/RealJoelSmalley/status/1417489179089453068
https://twitter.com/alsan_burak/status/1417743561500594177
Something really odd is going on:
"In Europe we are seeing surges at many places where most of the
population has already been vaccinated.
At the same time, the 15 least vaccinated countries don‘t seem to face
any problem."
https://twitter.com/holmenkollin/status/1415989536933490688
Be assured there is much, much more evidence being analyzed by
independent researchers which undermines the pharmaceutical giants press
releases. Conflict of interest results in lies
thanks
Max
On 7/21/2021 11:15 AM, Cyndiann Phillips wrote:
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93658?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2021-07-21&eun=g1787146d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Headlines%20Top%20Cat%20HeC%20%202021-07-21&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition
<https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93658?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2021-07-21&eun=g1787146d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Headlines%20Top%20Cat%20HeC%20%202021-07-21&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition>
Preprint publisher finds evidence of plagiarism, problems with raw
data
A large Egyptian study of ivermectin for COVID-19 patients has been
retracted over concerns of plagiarism and serious problems with their
raw data, the publisher confirmed to /MedPage Today/.
Michele Avissar-Whiting, PhD, editor-in-chief of the preprint server
/Research Square/, said in an emailed statement that the study was
withdrawn <https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v4> on
July 14 "because we were presented with evidence of both plagiarism
and anomalies in the dataset associated with the study, neither of
which could reasonably be addressed by the author issuing a revised
version of the paper."
Hill added that his team will also include a recently published
500-patient randomized controlled trial from Argentina, published in
/BMC Infectious Diseases/
<https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5>,
which found no effect for ivermectin in terms of preventing
hospitalization in patients with COVID-19. It also found that those
who received ivermectin required invasive ventilation sooner than
those on placebo.
