Phil, PT, et el, I'm not Ode, but I would strongly disagree with your statement Phil, as there is no conclusive evidence that nanoparticles are superior to EIS. You can make arguments on either side, but you cannot draw a conclusion. The anecdotal evidence for the efficacy and safety of EIS is exponentially greater, and the cost effectiveness lends it to use by far more people in a wide range of protocols. Keep in mind that ions are single charged atoms (Ag+), while nanoparticles(AgNP) have no charge and are 'huge' by comparison. Let me give you a couple of examples that I think illustrate this (and if anyone has a different understanding please correct me):
1. The baking soda protocol that Ode and others have explained before will dramatically increase the impact of silver ions, but not necessarily silver particles. (I understand that the particles will shed ions, but not in the stomach) 2. Adding EIS to clay is a powerful tool, both internally and externally, and I do not believe that a pure colloid will work with clay nearly as effectively as EIS will, because clay is the colloid, and the electromagnetic state of clay is quite complex. 3. If you mix 'true' colloidal silver with zeolite, nothing will happen because the nanoparticles are not charged, and are too big for the zeolite to grab. But if you mix EIS with zeolite then some of the Ag+ ions will get grabbed by the zeolite, and then carried into the body. There are studies on premade silver-zeolite that show the advantages of this. That's just three examples, and I am not an expert. There will always be research funded for AgNP products because people want to patent and sell a new product to make money. And certainly there will always be special applications that warrant special products. But IMHO everyone is much much better off making their own EIS with some silver wires and batteries, or getting a simple device. Victor ************************* Victor F. Cozzetto Wise Traditions Nutritionist U.S.: (516) 908-1039 www.Vitagenics.net <http://www.vitagenics.net/> YouTube Channel <https://www.youtube.com/victorcozzetto/> ************************* On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 7:36 PM PT Ferrance <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm waiting for Ode to wade in! > PT > > > > On Saturday, January 16, 2021, 06:02:56 PM EST, Neville Munn < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hmmm, my belief...Both have their own efficacy, but I personally would not > ingest that 'CS' product. We have come a long way since the 1800's product. > > But then, each to his/her own opinion and/or belief I guess. > > N. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Phil Morrison <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, 17 January 2021 4:23 AM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* CS>Why I use CS - And not EIS > > Silver nanoparticles, and not ions, work best. > > https://www.silver-colloids.com/history-silver/ >
