My concern is that... By the sounds if it.. You can't control current This has been the most important part of CS production in terms of favouring a high ionic brew Which is what most of us would prefer, unless you have some other use for it of course. Also are you looking to produce an AC signal from a single battery? Then the beck design of zapper is for you. I do not use voltage multiplying bridges or inducters but a DC to DC converter to up my voltages. The beck design flips the polarity of its outputs as it doesn't output a 0v Its very smart and it works.. I've got schematics if anyone wants.. There's many on the net.. I'll email directly to those who ask as you can't send .jpg on this list. Cheers Asif
Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: John Popelish <[email protected]> Date: 03/08/2014 19:50 (GMT+00:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>New pulse generator design On 08/03/2014 01:58 PM, Asif Nathekar wrote: > > Hulda Clark / Don Croft type designs below > > this is the same type of circuit with the same functional > output > > http://www.stenulson.net/althealth/cspulse.htm > > Ive made this and found that my brew was getting "gold" > coloured > It made the brew pretty fast and I wasn't happy with it. > > After experimenting with pulsed DC circuits and current > controlled DC, I've stuck with Current controlled sticking > to 0.2ma per Square inch. including pulsed DC and > controlling current simultaneously! > > I have tried the suggested 1ma per square inch and it was > too much for my brewing setup since I do not stir for fear > of introducing contaminants and also i found that too > vigorous a stir ruined the brew anyway, Trem also found > similar results and did a lot a work to get the stirring work. > > I use a LM334 IC, It operates within 1v and 40V, is well > behaved with minimal circuitry, and can compensate for > temperature and drift. > > http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm134.pdf > > I hope this helps. Thank you, Asif. This information has helped me quite a bit. It shows me that none of these common ways to generate CS resembles the electrical waveform my circuit produces. The pulser circuits shown just switch the DC on and off. My circuit operates more like the ignition coil in a car, where an inductor is charged with a current, and then that current is switched to the electrodes, as the energy in the inductor runs down, producing more voltage than the battery makes, if the solution resistance is high (as expected with distilled water between the electrodes). Whether this change results in any difference in the final solution, or in the efficiency of electrode consumption remains to be proved. I have been experimenting with 2 square inch surface, 5 gram rectangular tag, bullion electrodes. It is also my goal to make the circuit just about destruction proof, regardless of whether the electrodes are open or short circuited, or if the battery is connected backwards. I am thinking of adding a polarity reversing switch to the output, so the anode and cathode can be interchanged, without having to move wires around. I would love to figure out a simple way to make alternating pulses have opposite polarity, to make a completely symmetrical output, to eliminate electroplating out the silver, but haven't gotten there, yet. -- Regards, John Popelish -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
