But because the vaccine is injected straight into the blood stream, it avoids all the body's natural defense systems and therefore *doesn't* arm the immune system in the way that you describe. This is where the bad effects are felt also. dee
> From: Dan Nave <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:53:56 -0600 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: CS> OT health / Big pharma > Resent-From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:53:55 -0800 > > Neville, > > I think you have some of that wrong. Vaccinations are given precisely > for the purpose of having the body mount an immune response. You can > make a case for problems caused by additives like thimerosol, and > unintended hitchhiking viruses etc, but these are separate issues from > the inherent value of vaccines. One criticism might be that the > immune system becomes too reactive because of these vaccinations. > > Dan > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Neville Munn <[email protected]> wrote: >> Absolutely 100% spot on, you've got my vote <g>. >> >> I tackled a woman a couple of years ago who had a kid less than one year old >> and it already had 4 vaccines, and she was lining that kid up for a 5th. I >> asked her if she knew that a toddler must develop it's own natural >> immunities to things as a kid and all those jabs would be doing is impairing >> or retarding the bodies natural immune development as the kid gets older. >> Of course I was ignored and considered an idiot - the classic brainwashed >> dux of the class {opinion}. She obviously had never considered the fact >> that the establishment has got it wrong on the odd occasion? >> >> Facts don't lie, if we were helped so much by cholesterol pills, >> vaccinations, pharma medications blah blah we should be bouncing with >> health, in fact it's the reverse, cholesterol is causing concern, more >> people are losing their minds, more people are coming down with diseases >> that are starting to make a comeback etc etc, we as a civilization are >> becoming more and more unhealthy and dependant on medications in most cases >> to keep people alive and functional. >> >> I'm the cook here and if I drop anything on the floor in food preparation it >> still goes into the pot, my wife goes ape but I ask her how the hell did we >> ever get past the Neanderthal age if they worried about dropping a leg of >> mammoth that had been char burnt on an open fire on a *dirt* floor in their >> caves? It's become a joke on me here cos I tell the family to get a grip on >> reality, and besides, I'm helping them develop a great natural immunity, >> they should be thanking me - LOL. Bring 'em up tough I say, no room for >> wooses in this world. >> >> N. >> >> ________________________________ >> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:27:43 -0500 >> >> Subject: Re: CS> OT health / Big pharma >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> One of the worst disservices that we have done to ourselves is the childhood >> vaccine programs, not that there haven't been some good things about them >> (small pox/polio) but... Most of us enter adulthood with immature immune >> systems. An oversimplification for sure, but one could say that developing >> cancer is a failure of the immune system. Children used to play outside in >> the dirt, etc.. their mothers didn't haul them off to the doctor's office >> for a magic pill every time they developed a little case of sniffles. Years >> ago, most people didn't have access to tylenol etc. to lower children's >> temps. Minor childhood diseases can serve a useful purpose. I did say >> minor childhood diseases.. diseases that are more disruptive and >> aggravating (like chicken pox or mumps) than dangerous. 'They' say we, of >> all preceding generations, live in almost pristine, sterile living >> conditions compared to our forefathers. Has that made us a healthier >> population? >> >> There was an article in the news a few years back that stated that cancer >> researchers discovered that people who took antibiotics were more likely to >> develop cancer, the implication being that somehow, taking a lot of >> antibiotics could cause cancer. I think they got the cart before the horse. >> The fact that more people who took antibiotics developed cancer is a given >> if you reverse the theory. That is... because of a weakened or immature >> immune system or response, these people would become sick more often than >> others (requiring more antibiotic therapy) and they would fall prey to >> cancer also because of a weakened or immature immune system. In my opinion, >> if not for the immune response in human beings, the race would have become >> extinct a long time ago. So, between an immature immune system and a toxic >> environment, we seem to be sicker than ever. Lola H. >> >> > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > >
