Now, now, keep it civil.
Problem? Where? But I think if you whistle, I'll point.
Lot of fancy talk and misleading info in that blog. I use far less
paraphernalia than that, as most on this planet do, and I store my product in
clear glass storage vessels, and mine doesn't degrade after months in storage.
I definitely don't need to scrape anything off the surface of the water??? The
only thing I'll concede is that I store mine in a cupboard, but apart from that
what you produce is no better to what I produce, and that of most everyone else
out there.
Failing a suitable response to my request for your laboratory analysis reports,
I rest my case.
N.
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:03:47 +0000
Subject: Re: CS>PPM vs uS
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Take your problem somewhere else
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Neville Munn <[email protected]> wrote:
8-12ppm would be acceptable for *anyone* wishing to produce 10ppm in the home
with LVDC using whatever meter they choose!
And I was asked for considerably more than 20ml when I had my lab tests done
using AAS.
No meter is "hopelessly inadequate" for the home producer, they are a guide to
repeatable production levels of silver relative to the individuals methods,
means and practices of production in the kitchen, regardless of how inaccurate
they may be. ANY meter is better than none for the home producer for the
purpose of approximating silver content in what an individual is making. Most
home producers have not the means for laboratory analysis so what do they do?
Stop making their own and purchase a product just because a ppm is written on
the label?
A uS or EC meter is the best the punter can do, or a TDS meter and doubling the
reading, how accurate does the punter need to be in the scheme of things home
produced?
In my opinion it's this sort of information that is potentially confusing and
misleading for the punter, and will have them thinking they *MAY?* not be
producing a good quality product in the home without a laboratory
analysis...which is total bunkum and balderdash! If there is nil mud or gravel
or other abnormalities observable in their product after days/weeks or months
in storage, it's as good as can be made, using a meter of their choosing as a
guide!
Could you put up laboratory analysis results of 5 consecutive dated batch
samples you had tested indicating total silver content for each, and brewed for
identical time frames?
I'm the voice of an uneducated punter, humour me.
N.
