I never knew about this, and most people don't. I didn't until a few
years ago when I met a small time organic tobacco farmer, and discovered
how medicinal and healthy real tobacco can be - its a healer. Anyway,
he points a bunch of this stuff out about it, I was shocked. He also
showed me secret Philip Morris memos from the 50's that showed they
understood the dangerous of this radioactive spray, that an alternative
was found, but was more expensive, so they elected not to switch to
this, and bury the data. Govt. was very complacent in all of this.
The radiation exposure some estimate to be 1-10 Xrays per pack as you
noted, however what they don't tell you is this is an Isotope with a
thousand year shelf life. So that means really it is that amount of
Xrays while the particle is in your body, and unless you get some kind
of chest infection, mucus it up, and cough it out, it's going to be
there awhile! (or it comes out in some other fashion) When you get a
chest Xray, you aren't inhaling particles of radioactive dust, it's
taken, and you walk out. Big difference.
Something to share.. Francis Nixon published a book that's been fairly
suppressed over 50 years ago with a whole ton of amazing healing
remedies in it.. She discovered a method to "Reset" your human energy
field to remove damage from accumulated radiation. I have done it, and
love it, I do it 1-2 times a year to scrub off anything I pick up.
Basically, in filtered bath water dump in 1 pound of natural sea salt,
and 1 pound of baking soda, bathe in this for 15-20 minutes, moving
around, covering your body, stretching, dunk your head, and enjoy it.
When you get out, dry off, go relax in a quiet, private area, and then
eat some yogurt or take some probiotics. Works for me.
Bob Banever wrote:
bodhisattva,
Actually smoking a pack of cigarettes gives the smoker the
equivalent amount of radiation of one chest x-ray. It's my
understanding that the nitrogen rich fertilizer used is the source of
the radiation... it is made from uranium tailings and sold to make
fertilizer. I don't believe it is sprayed though... it is mixed in
with the soil. This was actually published in the New England Journal
of Medicine in the early 80's. I remember reading the article.
Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "bodhisattva"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: CS>More on Cell-Phone and Cell-Tower radiation
Sadly, much of what you will find out there mainstream, is
disinformation. Seek the truth within, and you will be guided to
external events that give you the truth you sought. That's been my
experience.
I knew the entire anti-butter/egg movement was garbage, those are
super foods. In fact Dr. Weston Price found K2 before it was known as
K2 (He called it X-Factor) and a major source of this was butter and
eggs, but sourced from things fed greens, not grains. Did you hear
that? A cow fed grains doesn't have the ingredients essential for
good life, either for it, or us. So if you eat meat, only eat organic
grass fed meat, Ok? But this doesn't take science to tell us, it's
really common sense. If you start to get a holistic view of nature,
and life, then the truth will become self evident to you, and
violations of natural law will be revealed to be one of the
trademarks of our nasty situation we're in. Planet wide, and personally.
Smoking probably isn't too bad for you, the tobacco sold by major
firms, which has had radioactive particles sprayed on it is what
kills you. Did you know that? Most people do not know this, and it
has been a closely guarded secret for decades. That's right, major
tobacco firms that sell more than 100k of tobacco a year are required
to purchase radioactive spray from the govt. and spray it on their
crops. What kills you, slowly, is very tiny dosages of radioactive
particles, over a fairly extended period of time, lodged in your
lungs, then spreading into your bloodstream and it is those tiny
particles that makes second hand smoke deadly.. I'd bet nobody ever
died from smoking organic, home raised natural tobacco!
I'll give you one more carrot... Vitamin-D.. Have you wondered why
they're promoting Vitamin-D so much everywhere you look? Do they
really want you to live to 120-150 or is there something else behind
this? Let's examine the Material Handling Data Sheet for D3, what
does it say? It's listed as a class 3 poison, right up there with
arsenic. Long term ingestion can cause mental retardation, and
cognitive disorder (free will). Anything over 5 pounds of D
transported has to have toxic certification labels. (Placard). No
other vitamin has this warning, nada, none of them, perhaps this is
why Vitamin-D makes the most effective rat poison on the planet.
Which rodent do they use in clinical trials again? That's right,
Rats. How many people know Vitamin-D is a major ingredient in most
rodent poisons? You need sunshine, not rat poison, Ok?
People brag about a 70 or 80 year lifespan, nonsense, humans should
be living into their 120's.
Richard Goodwin wrote:
Do the research
Unfortunately, it is hard or impossible to prove a negative, and for
every theory out there, whether crackpot or legitimate, there seems
to be some "research" that proves the theory true. If I believed
all the research out there, I would drive myself crazy trying to
avoid all the dangerous things in this world. Or I would live a
short miserable life and die early of hunger, thirst and utter boredom.
My parents went for years drinking decaf coffee because caffeine was
bad for you, then they found out decaf was worse. They went for
years avoiding eggs because they were bad for you, now eggs aren't
bad any more. After seeing so many bad things become ok years
later, and so many government-sanctioned "good" things be found to
be bad, I'm not prepared to take anything at face value, especially
if it comes from government, and second if it comes from "research
studies", which can be twisted, bent, or just plain broken, by
anybody with the money to commission them and a preconceived idea of
what the "studies" will prove.
Even the most "obvious" facts of modern life, accepted almost
universally by everyone without question, can be based on blatantly
bad science or statistics. Take for example the claim that smoking
kills 500,000 people a year because it causes heart disease, which
is the nation's biggest killer. Is that true? I have no doubt that
smoking is bad for people, but ... is it That bad?
To answer that question I looked in some of those Information Please
almanac books that give tons of statistics, including causes of
death in the US by category: heart disease, cancer, accidents, etc.
-- 50 some categories, and sure enough, cardio-vascular disease was
right up there at the top of the list by a mile. But ... something
is missing from all those lists. Look long enough and you might see
it too, but it is easy to miss, because it IS NOT THERE: According
to our illustrious government, nobody dies of old age! What a
miracle that is! The government has cured OLD AGE! Must be, since
they claim that nobody dies from it.
My guess is simply that "old age" is not something doctors are
allowed to enter on a death certificate as a cause of death, so they
have to write something else, and when in doubt, they put down
"heart stopped' or some such thing. But does that make for another
death from heart disease? obviously not.
So how many of those are there?
To answer that question i sent for a publication by the National
Safety Council, which resides in Chicago, and which is the source,
along with National Department of Health and Human Services (a few
years ago) of almost all the information in the statistical almanac
books. NSC sent me a little booklet that contained, among many
other things, a graph of cardio-vascular death rates vs age. Sure
enough, the numbers were very low right up to the late 60s or early
70s, when they started to ramp up, reaching a sharp peak around 80,
then dropping down again.
Where are all the "heart disease" deaths at other stages of life?
Not to be found in that graph, that's for sure. But then again, the
only way to find that tidbit of information was to buy a little
pamphlet for $25 (in 1990), from the National Safety Council, which
by the way is an independent corporation in Chicago, chartered by
and overseen by -- US Congress. Ok, so now we know where the
numbers, and the lies, are coming from for this issue.
Don't even get me started on drinking and driving....
Dick
----- Original Message ----
From: Del <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, April 20, 2010 2:41:00 PM
Subject: Re: CS>More on Cell-Phone and Cell-Tower radiation
If you sit next to a Wi-Fi base unit, you are absorbing more
radiation than my electrosmog detector could measure (pegged it at
max).
Likewise if you sit in front of a cordless phone base unit.
Likewise if you stay in the same room with an operating microwave oven.
Likewise when you key your cell phone or cordless laptop (some are
worse than others, iphone probably worst of all).
If you are within 900 feet or so of an operating tower, you burn
slowly rather than quickly.
Over many years the damage mounts up, because the radiation is
unrelenting, 24/7, and the damage is cumulative.
There are many reports of various illnesses (mostly cancer) in the
vicinity of these towers after years of exposure.
There are also plenty of in vitro studies that have demonstrated
cellular damage from tower exposure.
Do the research. You might reevaluate.
Del
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
