Brooks,
When you get the chance I have one question for you regarding DMSO and
CS. That is.... is it safe to mix 5 - 10% DMSO and CS to use as a nasal and
sinus wash? Since DMSO is so effective at breaking the mucosal barrier it
would seem to me an effective way of dealing with germs in the sinus cavity.
Looking forward to your response.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Brooks Bradley
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: CS>one for brooks
I have only a few moments of time, at present. However, I offer a couple of
comments on your inquiry.
First, there are a wide variety of enzymes which will act as
solvents/penetrants of MANY membrane-type tissues/films. Bromelain
is one (a very effective one) of many. Some enzymes are "narrow spectrum" in
effect and some are "wide spectrum". I have no knowledge of the effects of
specific enzymes on the effectiveness/enhancement of antibiotics.
Briefly, the most effective liposomal substances are...as a general
rule....the smallest in particle size. Ultrasonic
devices and HIGH PRESSURE DIFFRACTION DEVICES are, at present, the most
effective for accomplishing this. Conventional air compressors could serve,
quite adequately, in a large number of applications. The proviso being that one
is aware that geometry
of the discharge assembly is of great importance (small particles are vital
to non-injurious success).
We have utilized 90% colloidal silver X 10% DMSO SOLUTIONS to very powerful
effect in addressing serious pulmonary insults in equines (all ages). We have
not used enzymes in direct-address situations involving horses. Primarily,
because nothing we have ever evaluated has approached the ability of DMSO as a
mucous-barrier penetrating agent. Coarse-particled
gases (liquid mixtures) pose a potential threat for enabling pneumonia-type
insults.
Liposomal encapsulation does, indeed, offer some profound
advantages.....especially when utilized through proper
supporting equipment. However, I would counsel that "fiddling/experimenting"
with pulmonary challenges among horses, by inexperienced persons (even
professionals), is a very DANGEROUS endeavor. The least threatening/effective
protocols we have ever utilized involved oxygen-driven fluids which were
micro-sized and furnished via systems of the re-breather type.
I must go now. I hope these comments are of value to you.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : Re: CS>one for brooks
Date : Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:58:16 -0600
From : Dan Nave <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Oral bromelain was reported to be very effective in potentiating
antibiotics. I think this is due to it's action in
penetrating/dissolving biofilms, or some similar action.
Dan
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, polo wrote:
> Hopefully Brooks will have time to consider and comment on this.
>
> I have long been interested in protocols that will efficiently attack
> biofilm infections. It seems that inhaled (nebulized) liposomal
> medications are very effective in penetrating very difficult to treat
lung
> biofilms. Some recent studies have suggested that liposomal antibiotics
are
> superb treatments. Here is one:
>
> http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/61/4/859
>
>
> The above study used a compressor type of nebulizer (nebulizer PARI
LC
> Star). Anyway, I would like to try liposomal colloidal silver in a
> nebulizer for biofilm lung infections, particularly in racehorses.
Normally
> we use ultrasonic nebulizers as opposed to the older compressor type
> nebulizers as was used in the above study. Ultrasound nebulizers vaporize
> the medication into super small droplets that can be pushed into the lung
> via an air jet. The older compressor type uses a small air compressor to
> vaporize the inhaled medication producing larger medication particles to
be
> breathed in. Naturally, the ultrasound nebulizer technology produces
small
> droplet size which is more conducive to lung inhalation efficacy.
>
> What I would like to know, do you see any problems with producing
> colloidal silver liposomes using your home made protocol and (2) would an
> ultrasonic nebulizer be detrimental to the liposomal structure? Would an
> older compressor type nebulizer as used in the study be better in putting
> liposomes into solution for inhalation purposes or would the newer
utrasonic
> nebulizers not over-whelming affect liposomal structure upon vaporzation
or
> might it even be beneficial?
>
> As a side note, I want to add that heavy metals seem particularly
> effective against biofilms of which I would venture a guess that
colloidal
> silver would be a superb medication, if one could only get it to be
absorbed
> by the biofilm. Liposomal technology may be the key!
>
> doug
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour
