Evening Faith,
At 12:26 PM 5/5/2008, you wrote:
It is a long story and I am not ready to go into it. Of course I know
the cause. I am living it. thanks anyway. Faith G.
I figured as much. You said a lot more than you realize.
And I could say, "Me too".
It would take a complete life history to explain, so I understand your
thinking and statement.
Often I tell more of my life history than I really want to state.
My mother lived to be 91.5 while my father died at age 57.
And their life history explains much of the reasons for the age difference.
When you read of people that lived to be 90, 100, 110, or longer, of
course it was their life style and life history that contributed largely to
the years they lived.
I feel a great deal of sympathy for the younger generations.
( this includes my children and grand children )
The older ones of us had many years of the good earth that the younger
people will never have.
There is little we can do about it.
Two of my children, out of 3, try hard to be healthy. So far, my son is 41
and has no known health problems. He takes many supplements and eats like
a horse. Like the head of the Farmington Heart study suggests.
One is a mainstream believer, and has many ailments. How did I fail ?
Only two our of three ?
Here is an interesting article about all this, Note the lifestyle of the
Eskimos !
At first glance the Eskimos' diet would seem to be a cardiologist's nightmare.
http://niazi.com/Omega/fishtale.htm Title "A Fish Tale"
For example, some types of fish have long been considered harmful because
of their "high" content of saturated fats and cholesterol; the new
discoveries show that all types of fish are good for health. Fatty fish
such as salmon and shellfish, which were considered equivalent to eggs and
lard, are now freely recommended as are oysters, clams and scallops because
fish of all types are rich in a type of fat which is good for the heart -
omega-3 fat.
Wayne
Wise people change their mind, ....... Fools never do.
===========================
