John, I don't find much value in this sort of philosophical discussion if approached with the point of view that we will actually be able to find an objective answer that is "TRUE."
"The answer is stated in terms of the question." One's presuppositions, or those that you give weight to will determine the place where your logic ends up. Dan -----Original Message----- From: John Plumridge [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 9:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>An even easier way to eat raw eggs. --On 5 September 2007 22:14:15 -0500 Dan Nave <[email protected]> wrote: > Cut it with the ax you're grinding...> Dan Nice repartee, and quick. Dan. Thanks. But that won't do as a serious reply, and I don't expect you really think or percieve I have an axe to grind. I am interested in debate with you because of the opinions you've offered: they are not My last are more like not saying anything, nor quoting books from pre-history. Mine are refutations of what I think is fallacious reasoning spread to all our children (especially by those in control of the system of education). John -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
