If the argument being presented is nuanced and does not descend to pure charlatanry, it is quite easy, and entirely appropriate, to respond in kind and find common ground.
--srs (iPad) On 08-Apr-2013, at 6:24, Sriram Karra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Denying it all and debunking any connection between religion and science, >> and ridiculing the people who profess it, kind of helps prevent several >> deliberate attempts to subvert and replace science with religious dogma. >> >> > Isn't that just replacing one pile of crap with another equally stinky > pile? Where is the nuance and subtlety that is needed to make sense of and > make peace with the pathetic human condition?
