Thanks everyone for the quiz help (more audio -visual question banks welcome)  
and Mr Bonobashi for the encouraging noises!!


I always wondered about this...Mr Cecil from The Straight Dope has nailed it..

Naresh

Why is India 30 minutes out of step with everybody else?

June 5, 1981
Dear Cecil:

It must be these uncertain times, but once again I find myself coming to you to 
find the solution to a tantalizing enigma. In banks and other places that want 
to give that continental effect, one sees rows of clocks showing the time in 
various locales--New York, Paris, London--you know what I mean, being a man of 
the world. Anyway, the hour hand varies, but the minute hand is always the 
same--except for Bombay! It's always half an hour off. Or is the rest of the 
world half an hour off? I'm very concerned about this. Please explain so if I 
ever go to Bombay I can set my watch correctly.

— Garnet J., Seattle

Dear Garnet:

Bombay, and India generally, isn't the only place chronometrically out of step 
with the rest of the world. Lots of countries, particularly in Asia, are a 
half-hour out of sync, including Burma, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan.

Some have even stranger quirks. If my handy time-zone map here is to be 
believed--I am a little dubious about some of it--Nepal is 40 minutes off the 
mark. Saudi Arabia, ever the trailblazer, has some bizarre system in which 
clocks are supposedly reset to midnight every day at sunset. Keeping one's 
watch properly attuned aboard the Riyadh-Rangoon express must be an exhausting 
experience.

All of this traces back to the haphazard system of timekeeping prevalent before 
the 1884 Washington conference that established Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) as 
the international reference point. The conferees divided the world into 24 
zones, the time in each of which was to differ from a whole number of hours 
from GMT.

Prior to this, people made use of "local mean time," i.e., they figured out 
approximately when the sun was directly overhead, called that noon, and went 
from there. City A's time would thus differ by some odd number of minutes from 
that of cities B and C to the east and west. For instance, in 1880, England 
established two times zones for the British Isles--GMT for England, and Dublin 
Mean Time, 25 minutes earlier (or later, depending on how you look at it), for 
Ireland.

After the standardization conference, most countries "rounded off" their local 
time, as it were, so that it differed by a whole hour(s) from GMT and from 
adjoining time zones. But some, for reasons of geography or politics, rounded 
off to the half-hour. Newfoundland, for example, was (I think) three hours, 35 
minutes, and some seconds behind GMT before standardization, and elected to 
round off to three hours, 30 minutes--owing, I suppose, to the native 
perversity of its inhabitants, who delighted in being out of sync with the rest 
of Canada.

India, as it happens straddles two time zones, but for obvious reasons 
preferred to have one uniform time throughout the country. Rather than choose 
between GMT+5 and GMT+6 (which would make dawn and dusk in the far reaches of 
the country either unusually early or unusually late), the government 
apparently decided to split the difference. I can't explain Saudi Arabia, but 
nobody else ever has either.

— Cecil Adams



On 11-Oct-2012, at 8:38 PM, Ingrid Srinath <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do peruse: 
> http://old.qi.com/links/
> 
> Especially:
> 
> http://www.straightdope.com/
> 
> 
> Ingrid Srinath
> 

Reply via email to