Pranesh Prakash wrote, [on 10/3/2009 5:49 PM]: > > I'm just wondering about the distribution of Silk membership wrt gender.
Exploring socio-psychology (whatever that means) on the lines of "I will not talk about balls in front of women but will use the word square just in case anyone accuses me of thinking of what's inside your underwear" reminds me of what unrevealed thought process might have been used in naming this thread gender rather than sex. I hail from a backgrund of unrelenting prudery - a 1960s Indian who got vicarious pleasure from watching Woodstock (the movie), having grown up listening to Cliff Richard crooning: > Someone else is in your arms tonight > while I'm all alone and blue Point is - times have changed. My kids are listening to this: > What you gon' do with all that junk? > All that junk inside your trunk? > I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk, > Get you love drunk off my hump. > My hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, > My hump, my hump, my hump, my lovely lady lumps (Check it out) So why not move with the times and call a boob a boob and not consider it a booboo to do that? shiv
