On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Udhay Shankar N <[email protected]> wrote:
> ss wrote, [on 3/13/2009 5:32 PM]: > > > Mahesh - this is actually a juvenile statement because you don't know > where I > > am coming from but you reveal where you are coming from. > I said that a particular instance would be distressing to sexually conservative folks. It's a self-selecting statement and would only apply to people who classify themselves as such, and not to people who don't. Nothing was ad hominem. > > > > Regardless of whether I am sexually conservative or liberal I have a > > viewpoint. > And it is viewpoints we have been arguing upon, and nothing else. > > > > > I suspect that you feel it is "oh so cool" to push for free sex and > frequent > > change of partners while talking as if those who are more "conservative" > are > > somehow troubled by your implied (and "cool") sexual liberalism. The > mood of > > the conservatives is important to you. > > > Gosh, there we go with the "free sex" bit again. :-) For the record, not once have I stated or implied a preference for free sex. Or for that matter, for paid sex either. :-) To repeat, I have clearly stated that I believe there is a large area in the middle between the opposite extremes of "fidelity" and "free communal sex" that most creatures exist in. Coolness, liberalism, the price of fish and the GDP of North Korea didn't come into it. > > > In fact that reveals more about you than me. > Not that I have very much to hide :-) > > > Can we move the discussion back to ideas rather than people, please? > This is too close to Ad Hominem for my comfort. > Lead on, Obi-wan! > > Udhay > -- > ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com)) > >
