ss wrote, [on 12/18/2008 9:52 AM]: >> shiv, since udhay must be busy, can i post a reminder that we don't do >> ad hominem here? > > Correct. > > Accepted. And my apologies. This was the milder one. I believe my really > egregious ad hominem in an earlier post was missed. Or ignored out of > goodwill. Apologies for that one too. > > But I believe that I needed to to be a troll before anyone else started > paying > attention to what was being done in the guise of intelligent conversation.
Shiv, As Rishab surmised, I've been busy (a couple of my largest deliverables for the year are due this week). But the other reason is that I've not been maying much attention to this thread - which brings me to your claim(s) above. I suspect the fatigue factor with your rhetorical tactics is one reason you're not seeing as many replies as you used to. Be that as it may, I would appreciate avoidance of ad hominem in postings to this list. As a quick reminder, here are the simple rules of silklist: 0. Assume Goodwill. 1. No Ad Hominem. 2. No Spam. Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
