You haven't actually read my book judging from your comments, But you are also provoked enough by my comments on here to put up an unending defence of your ill informed viewpoint.
I am not disputing your right to hold your viewpoint. I just think you are wrong. Being wrong is hardly a crime, although it is a temporary disability for some. It is not in my nature to mock people who change their views to coincide with mine (on this issue) after a few months or years, even after having made comments that sound foolish in retrospect. A large number have already done this adding to my seemingly arrogant confidence. The door is still open to you, should you desire to open your eyes. I will drop the subject now. Peace :) shiv On Sunday 14 Dec 2008 2:50:29 am ashok _ wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:49 AM, ss wrote: > Don't you think your book is like the example i have cited above ? > (I know many 'credible' books end up being written like this... there > are also many film reviewers who publish reviews without ever having > seen the film... they simply read the reviews of another reviewer... )
