On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, he doesn't just coin it, he practices it - this public > debunking is silly. Entertaining of course, but silly. And why is it silly? Because it is not realistic? Because it does not serve a purpose? (If this is the reason, please explain why a public debunking of 'security' is silly...) -- Please read our new blog at: http://blog.prathambooks.org
