i have a lot of respect for people who've actually fought in the army and risked their lives, even if i disagree with them when they think that it's the way to solve problems and such "macho" approaches are worth more than the principles of democracy and self-governance. i don't have respect for suggestions that _others_ risk their lives for such approaches; sadly, most people who want to be "tough" want to talk "tough" while others have to be "tough".
in any case, as sangvi points out, such notions are very 20th century, and will really hold india back. shiv might rightly note that most indians are not modern democrats who believe in principles of self governance and rationality etc; but i would suggest that most indians care more about having healthcare, food and jobs for themselves and their families than grand notions of national pride. stupid nationalism is going to hold china back, and will hold india back too, unfortunately, stuck in violence and poverty for the many while a few have the luxury of talking tough. On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:35:24PM +0530, ss wrote: > On Monday 18 Aug 2008 8:51:33 pm . wrote: > > It's time to think if India wants to be bullied into acquiescence by > > terrorists. > > Atta girl! That's the spirit! > > shiv >
