On Tuesday 22 Jul 2008 10:00:16 pm Raul Siddhartha wrote: > > But it wouldn't hurt anyone if it was the ultimate would it? > > It would, in fact. It would mean you couldn't improve upon it. Hardly > the definition of God.
Sorry. You don't even need to believe in god to be a Hindu. Accepting that god exists is a form of centralization that is restrictive. You can be Hindu and atheist, or even anti-theist. It is only if one is hooked on to the idea that there is a "god" and that "god" is THE greatest that one starts competing and comparing with other gods and being concerned about a "god who cannot be improved upon". How naively theist. shiv
