>a sample group of four individuals. >Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find....
Ah. Deepa. On 8/30/07, Lawnun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really have very little to add to this one, aside from the fact that it's > already sparked others to question the study's efficacy [1]* > > http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/ > Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the > protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate > the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four > individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on > average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either > directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the > cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. > These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for > government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). > Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the > government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in > fact have started the helmet craze for this reason. > > *[1] http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=200511112730.afdb_effectiveness* > * >
