On 08/02/06, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:20:20PM +0530, Biju Chacko wrote:
>
> > you sued for libel, for example. However, there doesn't seem any
> > consequence for being gratuitously offensive against a religion.
>
> What precisely is wrong with being gratuitiously offensive against
> a religion?

Nothing -- depending on your point of view! :-)

However, there seem to be a bunch of loonies out there who think the
correct response is violence. I'm trying to understand if there is
legal recourse that you can point them to.

-- b

Reply via email to