At 2006-01-09 14:38:51 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Do you want to do the Moon, stars, the planets, or nebula?

"Yes" :-)

Seriously, I think I'd spend most of my time on stars and planets. I'm
not hoping for much in the way of nebulae, beyond looking at M42 and a
couple of other easy-to-see ones. The moon I can already observe with
my 20x binoculars.

> I was wondering whether you're a candidate for a refractor, a
> reflector, or a Maksutov-Cassegrain,

What I had in mind was a smallish (75-100mm) reflecting telescope in a
Dobsonian mount. I'm not averse to putting things together myself, but
I thought grinding and silvering the mirror was beyond me (for now).
So I've been looking at kits like the ones featured here:

http://www.galileotelescope.com
http://www.sharpvisionindia.com

A Maksutov-Cassegrain would be ideal, but the ones I've seen are all
quite expensive, and I gather they're not exactly easy to make (but
perhaps I could get a kit with just the optics; I haven't looked).

> whether you need automatic tracking, computer control, and a
> (chilled?) CCD camera.

Beyond my wildest dreams. I wasn't even seriously hoping to be able to
hook up my SLR (unsuitable as it is for long exposures) to it. Should
I be? Wouldn't any sort of photography need automatic tracking? Can I
put something to accomplish that together easily?

> Will this need to be portable? Which kind of car do you have?

Portability is essential.

I have a Swift <http://www.marutiswift.com> (it's an Indianised version
of the Suzuki Swift, and I'm extremely impressed with it so far, after
having taken it on a 1250km drive to the Himalayas a week or so ago).

> Can you access unpolluted (aerosols and city lights) observation
> spaces easily?

Not easily, which is why portability is important. I can get to the
desert in a few hours' driving, or to the mountains in a day or so.

It turns out that a friend has an 200mm reflector gathering dust across
town, and I can borrow it. The scope and stand are monstrously large. I
can just about imagine lugging them along on an overnight star-watching
trip to Rajasthan, but there's no way I could take them to the hills (I
would have a lot of other luggage on a longer trip).

In practice, I suspect it would spend most of its time on my roof. Far
from ideal viewing conditions, but on otherwise clear nights, I guess
the humongous aperture would make up for all that.

So I'm still interested in a small and high-quality alternative.

-- ams

Reply via email to