I remember the Thursday group from 2004.
It was, privileged, to say the least. Not a fan. The misogyny was palpable,
locker room sentiment dressed nicely with single malt whiskey.

Different groups of friends but pretty much the same model with the split -
Those who drank alcohol - alcohol bill split equally between them
Those who didn’t - their drinks split between them separately.
Food was almost always split equally between all members.

Of course we stayed up to date with each other’s lives and we knew/were
careful with folks who were going through life changes/had economic
challenges and we rallied around them, and took care of their bill
sometimes/or secretly subsidised their per head cost.

Payment was generally made by one person and everyone else at the table
immediately paypal/upi transferred money to them.

It’s made for a very comforting environment where there is no discomfort of
going out with friends - you’ll either take care of someone or be taken
care of.

Huda Masood
+91 9886796967


On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 09:51, Ra Jesh via Silklist <
silklist@lists.digeratus.in> wrote:

> Varies by group.
>
> I am also someone who is happy to pay the bill that day and do the math
> next morning (when I am sober, LOL) and message in some common group chat
> what each person's share is.
>
> I think the right time to get consensus on the modality is 5 min BEFORE
> the bill is asked for. People have better ideas at this point than when the
> bill is actually sitting there on the table.
>
> Definitely another point that lines up with the "mental model" aspect.
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 09:16 Udhay Shankar N via Silklist <
> silklist@lists.digeratus.in> wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a topic that comes up every now and again. Speaking as someone
>> who regularly organizes group meetups,
>>
>> 1. We usually split the bill evenly, because (at least as far as food is
>> concerned) the entire table ends up sampling whatever is ordered.
>> 2. The people I tend to meet with tend to order things which are roughly
>> similar.
>> 3. Liquor is where this model faces challenges. A teetotaller (or even a
>> beer drinker, such as myself) might feel hard done by, if asked, on a
>> regular basis, to partly subsidize someone ordering much more expensive
>> spirits.
>>
>> The solution isn't easily achieved. At least in India, separate checks
>> aren't the norm, and most POS systems aren't set up for it. Also, keeping
>> track like this is a tedious and mood killing chore at the end of a
>> pleasant evening.
>>
>> What are the thoughts of the hive mind?
>>
>>
>> https://www.businessinsider.in/policy/economy/news/splitting-the-check-is-no-longer-restaurant-etiquette-in-2024-its-every-diner-for-themself/articleshow/107123596.cms
>>
>> --
>>
>> ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
>>
>> --
>> Silklist mailing list
>> Silklist@lists.digeratus.in
>> https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist
>>
> --
> Silklist mailing list
> Silklist@lists.digeratus.in
> https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist
>
-- 
Silklist mailing list
Silklist@lists.digeratus.in
https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist

Reply via email to