Reading this article today
- 
https://www.manatt.com/Insights/Newsletters/Advertising-Law/Cryptocurrency-Pays-Price-for-Alleged-Harm-With-Ad


I'm kind of curious what peoples thoughts are around these issues?

In the light of......

-        The social networking site Facebook, banned advertisements for 
crypto-related and other speculative financial products as of January 2018.

-        Just a few days after Google's announcement, news reports speculated 
that Twitter would be next to prohibit advertisements for initial coin 
offerings as well.

-        New gun content rules on YouTube send one gun channel to Pornhub - 
https://nypost.com/2018/03/22/gun-videos-turning-up-on-pornhub-ahead-of-youtube-ban/


How come gay bakers are a constitutionally protected species according to 
SCOTUS ....but crypto startups and gun reviewers can have their rights trampled 
on like the unwashed floor mats at an all you can eat buffet.

I know YouTube, Facebook and Google are private companies and as such they get 
to determine what content goes on their site. But at the same time I cant help 
but wonder....shouldn't all "currently fully legal" topics be freely shown and 
discussed?

So if YouTube bans a baking video channel that only reviews gay wedding 
cakes.....its a national emergency, but if YouTube bans some rednecks who like 
to talk about and shoot AR-15's at plywood....this is ok. (InRange isn't a 
small content provider either....they had 145,000 registered subscribers. I can 
imagine a lot of startups on silicon beach would be very happy with these kinds 
of numbers).

If Facebook is allowed to ban discussions about Crypto......we are all lead to 
believe this is fine. But whats next? eg if they then use their powers to 
prevent us talking about startups looking to compete with Facebook.....then 
isn't it the same? What about governments around the world banning discussion 
on encryption and security methodologies "because it makes an educated society 
harder to monitor"

Our free rights to new ideas are being infringed upon. Last time I 
checked.....this isn't what the internet is about.

Thoughts?


Cheers,
Dean
P.S. I hope people get my humor about Gay Bakers, I fully support SCOTUS 
position. I just don't understand why the EFF isn't pursuing our other rights 
to discuss legal topics on these social media venues. Also I posted this here 
as I want to get the thoughts and input from smart people that I know are 
reading this here.....if you feel this isn't appropriate venue feel free to 
respond at - https://www.facebook.com/LiveCourtChat/posts/1632872166780926  
instead, ....well at least until challenging "the Man" is still allowed on 
Facebook anyway :).

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
Australia mailing list. Vist http://siliconbeachaustralia.org for more

Forum rules
1) No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
2) No jobs postings. You can use http://siliconbeachaustralia.org/jobs


To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Silicon Beach Australia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to