you know all said and done how the hell do you technically safe guard
against "Happiness" as a password?

but yes a dictionary attack is something they could have prevented with
rate-limiting!

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Shaon Diwakar <sh...@shaon.net> wrote:

>
> Implementing OAuth can get tricky when retrofitting, especially since
> a lot of sites such as Twitter may have unique/custom user
> authentication models, but it's definitely a step forward.
>
> For everyone working on a web app, please consider the following Top
> Ten common threats [1] along with the excellent materials at OWASP [2].
>
> It's good to think about security early in the requirements gathering
> phase (especially when outsourcing development) and Twitter's woes
> goes to show that its important to invest in safeguards.
>
> I can understand that its expensive to implement security when you're
> boot-strapping, but when you get to a scale like Twitter - there's
> really no excuse!!!
>
>
> [1]: http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2007
> [2]: http://www.owasp.org/
>
>
> On 09/01/2009, at 2:19 PM, Sherif wrote:
>
> >
> > Forget about oAuth - none of this problem gets fixed until we get some
> > decently coded applications!
> > More to my point:
> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39588628,00.htm
> >
> > Twitter hackers - a brute force attack. Twitter has no limit on login
> > attempts, no challenge-response and no Captcha.
> >
> > They are now working on changing all that..
> >
> > On Jan 8, 10:46 pm, Sherif <sherifgmans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> @silky - totally agree,  Twitter need to adopt a password anti-
> >> pattern:http://adactio.com/journal/1357/
> >>
> >> FriendFeed does it really well - they have a 'remote key' which
> >> third-
> >> party applications use - and not your actual username and passwords.
> >> Its been well thought out...
> >>
> >> I'm really amazed at how bad twitter is written (the many outages we
> >> had months ago (due to it being written more like a blog-architecture
> >> than a message-queue type of solution), and even more recently
> >> recently the phishing attacks)
> >>
> >> Just goes to prove to get a successful startup its a lot to do with
> >> timing and getting a big user-base .. they have done that very well.
> >> Hats off to them, you can deliver an average service - thats so
> >> popular - it takes something big to move all users off twitter...
> >> will
> >> this be it? I don't think it will...
> >>
> >> On Jan 8, 9:13 pm, Rex Chung <rex.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mashable had several post about this.
> http://mashable.com/2009/01/03/warning-twitter-phishing-attack-underway/
> >>
> >>> "You can follow updates on the attack by subscribing to the Twitter
> >>> topic #phishingalert"
> http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23phishingalert
> >>> Rex
> >>> --
> >>> Sydney: +61 421 591 943
> >>> HK:       +852 6901 2682
> >>
> >>> Ankoder - Video Encoding On Demandhttp://www.ankoder.com
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:02 PM, John Masson <jmas...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> An excellent point that some of us at work were discussing a few
> >>>> weeks
> >>>> ago, there are SO many dodgy looking sites asking for twitter
> >>>> credentials to do who knows what with it's scary!! It's like
> >>>> phishing
> >>>> attacks without even pretending to look like something else :)
> >>
> >>>> Will definitely aim to talk about this in our next Instantiate
> >>>> Podcast.
> >>
> >>>> JM
> >>
> >>>> On Jan 4, 5:06 pm, Elias Bizannes <elias.bizan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>>>> I personally believe Twitter is being irresponsible by creating an
> >>>>> ecosystem off their API without creating appropriate safeguards to
> >>>>> protect users like us. I am looking for some Aussie bloggers to
> >>>>> help
> >>>>> me make some noise. The silicon beach community literally turned
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> fight against the clean feed to a whole new level, so I'm
> >>>>> looking for
> >>>>> us do it again by creating a better Internet through example.
> >>
> >>>>> Quick background:
> >>>>> For you to give access to things like third party apps (like
> >>>>> Twhirl),
> >>>>> you need to give up your login and password. As has been
> >>>>> reported in
> >>>>> the tech news this last week, there have been security breaches of
> >>>>> people taking your Twitter password and selling it and the like. A
> >>>>> simple change to their API can avoid this bad password anti-
> >>>>> pattern.
> >>
> >>>>> With delegated authunentication or through the use of an open
> >>>>> standard
> >>>>> called "oAuth" you can actually allow websites to access your data
> >>>>> without you needing to give up your password (by simply giving
> >>>>> them
> >>>>> permission through the Twitter interface). What happens is that
> >>>>> instead of you punching in your password, and giving some random
> >>>>> your
> >>>>> personal details which they can then take advantage of, you can
> >>>>> instead have them request Twitter for authorisation, and you can
> >>>>> simply click a button saying "approved".
> >>
> >>>>> I will be posting something on the DataPortability Project's blog
> >>>>> about the issue and hope to give it some attention. The more
> >>>>> people we
> >>>>> have posting a synchronised blog post, the better chances we can
> >>>>> turn
> >>>>> this into news and get them to pull out their finger out. I know
> >>>>> for a
> >>>>> fact the only reason they are not doing this is because they don't
> >>>>> give it a high enough priority - but of course they don't, as
> >>>>> it's not
> >>>>> them hurting but us. With a bit of awareness, we can make people
> >>>>> realise there is a simple way to fix a very serious issue, which
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> comprimising your online identity.
> >>
> >>>>> I've already had to change my passwords a few times due to third
> >>>>> party
> >>>>> apps, and I am sick of doing it, and it annoys me when I know I
> >>>>> don't
> >>>>> need to do it!
> >>
> >>>>> Please contact me if you are willing to participate. For those
> >>>>> looking
> >>>>> to get a bit more exposure of their blogs, this is a good way to
> >>>>> do
> >>>>> it :)
> >>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>> Elias
> > >
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Blog: http://panyam.wordpress.com
URL: http://www.geocities.com/spany_1

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Silicon Beach Australia" group.
To post to this group, send email to silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to