On 03/31/2016 11:22 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 03/31/2016 09:39 AM, Thomas Schneider wrote:
>> Hm...
>> the current configuration of masquerade is this:
>> root@pc4-svp:/# cat /etc/shorewall/masq
>> #INTERFACE      SOURCE          ADDRESS
>> eth0            10.0.0.0/24     217.8.50.86
> 
> I don't understand what is going on here, but there is *still* no SNAT rule:
> 
> NAT Table
> ...
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1 packets, 60 bytes)
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> destination
> ...
> 
> 
> if you 'shorewall -vvv check', do you see the following?
> 
> Checking /etc/shorewall/masq...
>     Masq record "eth0 10.0.0.0/24 217.8.50.86" Checked
> 
> If you *don't* see that, then what does 'ls -l /etc/shorewall/masq' return?
> 

Rather than 'eth0', try 'UMB_IF' in the masq entry.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to