1. 更可配置，比如i3的titlebar在tab/stack模式下是不可隐藏的 2. 更灵活，bspwm更多的依赖系统的工具 3. 更符合习惯，window一般我只要两种模式：max和tiled, bspwm只在这两种之间切，i3就会不知道跑到哪里去了。我之前在i3上写了好长的脚本处理这个逻辑，现在用不着了。 4. i3bar不如polybar
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:33 PM Yu Changyuan <y...@shlug.org> wrote: > bspwm对比i3有什么优点? > > Jun Sheng writes: > > > 成功切换到bspwm > > 目前的方案是： > > 1. bspwm + sxhkd 解决wm 和hotkey > > 2. polybar做panel > > 用两个python程序显示desktop和tasklist > > 3. dzen2做一些通知类的程序 > > 4. dmenu做菜单 > > > -- > Best wishes ~ > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Shanghai Linux User Group group. To post to this group, send email to shlug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to shlug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/shlug?hl=zh-CN --- 您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了 Google 网上论坛的“Shanghai Linux User Group”群组。 要退订此群组并停止接收此群组的电子邮件，请发送电子邮件到shlug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com。 要在网络上查看此讨论，请访问 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/shlug/CAAYzEVAycm690f%3DguoEO9ukgKHH_cq4AAsGHi-oR9ZnE7%3D-1CQ%40mail.gmail.com。
