October '18. From the kind of activity, I'd say Dave Love is a time-
restricted yet dedicated FOSS maintainer. I'd assume he's busy
administrating an SGE installation, or simply doing something
satisfying with his life. Is that not the case? (Looking at the amount
of effort put into SGE, I really hope at least the latter is the case.)

To be honest, your question is not exactly trust-inspiring; I'm just
trying to build SGE to have a way of running it on modern Linux
distros.
This is just to evaluate it as cluster management tool (a class of
software I've never used, leave alone set up, before), because there is
in-house experience using SGE, so that was the first system I'm looking
at.

So, what's up with SGE, Daniel? Still recommended for production/new
designs?

Best regards,
Marcus

On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 12:16 -0400, Daniel Povey wrote:
> So is Dave Love still maintaining SGE?  When is the last commit?
> 
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:50 AM Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>
> wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers / list,
> > 
> > trying to build SGE for OpenSuSE leap 15.0 and Fedora >= 28, I
> > encountered quite a few obstacles, so I started by trying to do
> > what the
> > .spec does (fixes for that coming up, if you're interested).
> > 
> > However, when the thing finally built under OS leap, the sanity
> > checker
> > beat me with a stick for a missing n that slipped through Dave
> > Love's
> > fingers in 9dcf22749e, "Change many sprintf to snprintf".
> > 
> > Looks like that would actually lead to segfaults if the function
> > containing that typo was used.
> > 
> > Marcus Müller (1):
> >   qmon_arsub: actually use sNprintf when specifying length
> > 
> >  source/clients/qmon/qmon_arsub.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
_______________________________________________
SGE-discuss mailing list
SGE-discuss@liv.ac.uk
https://arc.liv.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/sge-discuss

Reply via email to