Why not using:
exchange = exchanges.remove(exchange.getExchangeId());
instead of
exchange = exchanges.get(exchange.getExchangeId());
exchanges.remove(exchange.getExchangeId());
It should be the same but in an atomic call.
On 10/26/07, Zacarias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that patch files are filtered or something. I attached the patch
> file at https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-822
>
> Cheer,
> Zacarias
>
> On 10/26/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could you raise a JIRA and attach your patch ? It seems to have been
> > removed from your email. Another solution is to use the nabble forums
> > too.
> >
> > On 10/26/07, Zacarias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I implemented a posible solution for the "component not owner" problem.
> > I
> > > found that
> > >
> > deployables/bindingcomponents/servicemix-http/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/http/processors/ConsumerProcessor.java
> > > sleeps meanwhile the jsr componet modifies the message.In JMSFlow the
> > > variable "exchange" is serialized to an MQ queue and deserialized that's
> > why
> > > when ConsumerProccesor wakes up exchange is in the wrong state. With
> > this
> > > patch I propose to take again the "exchange" from the "exchanges" list.
> > I
> > > tested it with Seda flow and JmsFlow separated and it works.
> > > I'm looking forward for your answer.
> > >
> > > Best regards.
> > >
> > > Zacarías Monzón
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
